header img
x

Introducing Our New Blog

July 16, 2010

I read blogs for information I need or perspectives I value. I read them for inspiration. Sometimes I read them for a good dose of rage that inspires me to work for a cause or give money to a candidate. The kind of blog I hope to write will do all of these things. [click to continue…]

More recreational boats are being manufactured, more Texans are using them and more deaths and injuries are occurring. Most boating accidents involve some form of operator error, but how many also involve manufacturing negligence?

Such was the case for Jacob Brochtrup, who lost part of his leg after he was caught in a propeller on Lake Austin. The boat manufacturer, Brunswick Corp., had not fitted the boat with the proper safety devices, including guards and cover for the propeller.  A jury later ruled Brunswick was negligent and awarded Brochtrup $3.8 million as compensation for his injuries.

Reckless or impaired boat drivers or passengers can also be held liable for injuries to others.  Statistics show most boating accidents involve some form of operator error such as inattention, carelessness, recklessness, excessive speed, and no proper lookout.  And alcohol plays a factor in more than half of all boating accidents, according to Boat US. A boating accident involving more than one boat usually is caused by a careless, reckless or impaired driver.

The 367-mile Texas Gulf Coast provides some of the best recreational boating experiences in the world. And Texas has more square miles of in-land water than any state in the U.S.  With more than half a million recreational boats registered in Texas, the potential for being involved in a boating accident is much higher than it used to be.  In 2009, some 33,000 people were injured and 34 lost their lives in boating accidents in Texas.

If you’re involved in a boating accident involving serious injury or death, make sure to contact an experienced boating accident attorney to investigate the facts and help you decide what to do.  If the accident involved boat manufacturer negligence, a lawsuit can often change the way a product is designed, making all of us safer.

 

Operating a boat while intoxicated is a federal offense. In Texas it can get you up to 180 days in jail, up to $2,000 in fines and suspension of your driver’s license.

But even boaters who aren’t drinking can be influenced by something called “boater hypnoses,” leading to lapses in judgment and alertness.

If you’ve never heard of “boater hypnosis,” join the club. I’m certainly familiar with the lulling, relaxed feeling of being on a boat. I didn’t know it had a name. According to the experts, “boater hypnosis,” results from the combination of wind, sun, glare, engine noise, motion from the water, and vibration.  But, they said, as little as four hours of exposure creates a type of fatigue that slows reaction time, similar to that of an intoxicated person.

Adding alcohol on top of “boater hypnosis” is a double-whammy and especially deadly, as statistics I found from the government bear out:  boating-related fatalities rank second to car crashes when it comes to transportation related deaths, and of these, more than 50% involve alcohol.

The “buzz” Isn’t Worth It

It makes sense. Just think about it:

  • Alcohol affects balance. A moment of dizziness or a miss-step can be fatal on or near the water. About 80% of boating fatalities occur from capsizing or falls overboard.
  • Alcohol slows reaction time. When you’re driving a boat you have to be constantly aware of other boats and objects in the water. A few second’s hesitation can put you on a collision course.
  • Alcohol affects eye sight, reducing peripheral vision, night vision and ability to distinguish colors.
  • Alcohol impairs judgment, essential to safe boating.  You may think you’re functioning normally, but you are not.

In 2009, 736 people died in boating accidents in the U.S. More than half of them would probably be alive today if alcohol hadn’t been part of their boating experience. It’s something to think about.

A 23-year-old worker who lost his leg in agricultural accident has been awarded $1.6 million in damages by a Pennsylvania jury.

Samuel C. Rollings was working in a grain bin when he slipped, catching his foot and lower leg in a drag chain on a conveyor belt. The jury found the machine’s designer, Ken Babcock Sales, liable for the injury because it failed to provide guards around the machine.

The jury also found that Collins’ employer, Fredonia Cooperative Association, Inc., was also negligent by not providing adequate worker training or warnings.

Employers have an obligation under the law to provide reasonable protections for workers on the job, especially if it involves working around moving equipment, like conveyor belts. This includes safety training and instructions. When an injury case goes before a jury, the jury decides whether the employer or equipment manufacturer met the standard of reasonableness.

Obviously, in this case, the jury believed the employer and machine designer could have done a much better job keeping workers safe.

Anytime a worker suffers a job injury that leads to lengthy or permanent disability, he should consult an attorney with work injury experience to see if he is owed compensation under the law. Not only might the worker receive compensation for lost income and medical costs, but the lawsuit may encourage the company to adopt safer practices.

Garcia-Karam has decades of experience in work injury cases which have been instrumental in making work places safer.

The government has launched a massive recall of pool and hot tub drain covers at the start of the nation’s summer season. The Consumer Product Safety Commission announced the voluntary manufacturer recall May 27, because it said the covers may not have been tested properly and may pose an unreasonable risk of entrapment to young swimmers.

The issue is not so much with the design of the covers – the government mandated design changes to deal with entrapment risk starting in 2008 – but with the laboratories that safety test the covers. The CPSC said the recall of an estimated one million covers is because they may carry an improper flow rating.

As I blogged about recently, the CPSC has been investigating the three labs that test pool and drain covers because of allegations they weren’t following proper testing procedures. The investigation turned up enough evidence to warrant the recall.

Several deaths prompted the government in 2007 to mandate a new design for pool and hot tub drain covers.  The problem was a combination of pressure and design. Pool and hot tub drains can exert up to 500 pounds of vacuum pressure.  If a swimmer or someone in a hot tub, particularly a child, got too close, the pressure could pull them down. If the drain is designed flush with the bottom of the pool, the body could cover the drain in such a way that it exerted even more pressure, in effect, trapping them underwater.

The new drain covers are designed with a raised dome, so that even if someone is pulled against it, water running into the drain from the sides will keep the pressure from becoming strong enough to hold them.

The consumer product safety commissioner says drain entrapment caused dozens of deaths between 1999 and last year. The models subject to this new recall were manufactured by A&A Aquastar, Color Match, Custom Model Products, Rising Dragon, and Waterway.  Pool operators and home owners should contact the maker of the drain cover to see what action if any is needed to make their pool or spa safe.

The Association of Pool and Spa Professionals is operating a 24-hour recall hotline at  866-478-3521, or visit www.APSP.org/draincoverrecall.

By Rick Garcia

As the Memorial Day weekend approaches, I find myself thinking about a newspaper story last summer about a terrible boating accident on Lake Conroe. A young woman accidently drove the family boat and its propeller over a father and son as they were being towed.  They were seriously hurt, and the son was in critical condition. The driver was only 20, with little experience operating a boat. The story said she’d accidently put the boat in reverse.

My gut reaction to the story was fear. I’ve been on the Gulf many times and seen how many young and perhaps inexperienced operators are out there (although age and experience don’t necessarily equate) and how easily such accidents can happen.

In 2009, there were 4,730 boating accidents in the U.S., which injured 3, 358 and killed 736 people. Of the people who died, 34 were Texans, according to figures compiled by the U.S. Coast Guard. All were people who’d gone out to have a good time with family or friends and just get away from it all and relax. It didn’t turn out that way.

Operator inexperience (86%) was cited among the top five contributors to boating accidents.  The others were operator inattention, excessive speed, improper lookout and alcohol. Another statistic that stood out was that almost three-fourths of all fatal boating accident victims drowned, and of those, 84% percent were not reported as wearing a life jacket. Alcohol was listed as the leading contributor in the fatal accidents

So right off the bat you see you can significantly reduce the likelihood of being killed or killing those you love in a boating accident by making sure:

  • Everyone wears a life jacket
  • Anyone who operates the boat has formal boating instruction
  • Alcohol is left on shore.

For some reason, formal boating instruction is not publicized as being as important as it is. Maybe because there didn’t used to be as many recreational boats out there and the people on the boats had grown up on the water. But as water becomes more crowded and more first-timers are allowed to take the helm it’s important that boating instruction be made a priority.

A good resource is the free boating instruction course offered online by the Texas Parks and Recreation Department.  It comes with an interactive, animated movie. And, for $13, an official boating safety certificate that might save on insurance.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

By Rick Garcia

Hospitals are the fourth leading cause of death in the U.S., producing more than 100,000 preventable deaths while harming another 15 million patients every year. These deaths and injuries also cause more than $50 billion in unnecessary health care costs annually.

Who pays for the cost of medical negligence? You and I do through our health insurance premiums, which keep going up. I received a notice from my health insurance company the other day which informed me “regretfully” that our family plan would be increased “to cover the rising cost of providing health care today.”

This was the bad news in the back of my mind when I read a report by the American Association for Justice about health insurance profits.  According to the report, Medical Negligence: The Role of America’s Civil Justice System in Protecting Patients’ Rights, health  insurance industry profits rose by 56% in 2009.  The top five for-profit health insurers made a whopping $12.2 billion. Meanwhile, 2.7 million Americans found their coverage dropped.

Similarly, the report noted, the top ten medical malpractice insurance companies made over $1 billion in profit in 2009, continuing gains in recent years.   Taken from statistics from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners and other industry sources, the report noted, “The average profit rate of the top 10 medical malpractice companies was eight times greater than the average for the Fortune 500. In fact, only five Fortune 500 companies could match the average profit level of the biggest medical malpractice insurers.”

This is the other side of the debate on health care costs.  The one that the medical industry would like to ignore and keep quiet while it pounds its fists against the podium against “frivolous lawsuits,” and while it continues to wage full out war on patients’ rights to seek legal remedies for serious medical negligence.

The medical insurance industry long has played the game of setting doctors and lawyers squabbling while it quietly sucks in profits. Doctors haven’t experienced big drops in medical malpractice insurance from a decade of “tort reform.” Taxpayers sure haven’t seen relief from paying for health insurance for the poor, the disabled and children.   Premium holders are lucky if they only get two increases per year.

The only winner in this game has been health care insurance companies and their stockholders.  The rest of us, regrettably, have been the losers.

By Rick Garcia

What do space heaters sold by Wal-Mart, Char-Broil vertical gas grills and Simplicity TV wall mounts sold through Costco this year all have in common? They were all made in China, bought by unsuspecting Americans and later recalled due to serious safety concerns.  And because the U.S. legal system is lagging the realities of global trade, most of these Chinese manufacturers will face no penalties or sanctions for dumping these defective products on our markets.

This is not a small problem. According to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, more than half the consumer products recalled in 2008 in the U.S were made in China.

Poor and elderly Americans on fixed incomes are often the hardest hit. Chinese products are often the cheapest on the shelves and sold through stores that cater to low-end shoppers.

Take one of the most recent examples of a massive recall of a Chinese-made product: three brands of space heaters sold through Wal-Mart. From December 2001 to November 2009, some 2.2 million of these $18 heaters were sold. It’s not hard to assume a lot of them served as substitutes for inadequate heating systems or too-expensive-to-turn on central heat.  Wal-Mart voluntarily recalled the heaters after reports of 21 instances where a defect caused the heaters to overheat, smoke, melt or catch fire, causing serious injury or property damage.

No doubt some of these instances, and many more unreported, will end up in lawsuits against Wal-Mart and other U.S.-based companies. But what about the Chinese manufacturers? Lawsuits are difficult or impossible to pursue against these companies because our laws are not yet set up to reflect foreign product liability issues.

Legislation pending before Congress could change all that. Senate Bill 1606, the Foreign Manufacturer Legal Accountability  Act,  would:

  • Make it easier for an injured consumer to serve the foreign manufacturer with notice of pending claims.  (Basically, legally notify the defendant that a court with jurisdiction has received a claim against a company so the company can respond).
  • Require that foreign manufacturers or producers of covered products register an agent, located in a state where the company does business, who would be able to accept notice of civil and regulatory claims.
  • As part of the registration, the foreign manufacturer or producer also would consent to state and federal jurisdiction for civil and regulatory claims.
  • Cover the following products – drugs, devices, cosmetics, biological products, consumer products, chemical substances, and pesticides manufactured or produced outside of the United States.
  • Direct the FDA and the Department of Agriculture to jointly study the possibility of requiring foreign food producers to have registered US agents.

This bill is awaiting a vote by the next Congress. Our lawmakers should vote for it for three important reasons:

  • U.S. businesses should not be forced to unfairly compete against foreign businesses that can easily skirt the law.
  • Chinese companies should face penalties that would, in turn, put pressure on them to put their products through rigorous safety testing, just like U.S. companies are required to do.
  • A fundamental right of Americans is to be able to use the U.S. Civil Justice System to hold companies accountable for deaths and injuries as the result of product negligence.

Hopefully this space heater fiasco will turn up the heat on lawmakers to enact this important legislation in 2011

By Rick Garcia

The recall of about 3,700 Toro Z Master ZRT Mowers should remind all of us as summer approaches of the dangers of riding lawn mowers, especially for children.

This particular recall was instituted this month by the Toro Company and the Consumer Product Safety Commission. It is related to a problem with a switch that could accidentally activate the mower after the user leaves the seat. Already, the company said it has received one report of a foot laceration because of the defect.

Riding lawn mowers are dangerous, especially to young children. Every year, 2,000 children under the age of 10 are seriously injured in riding lawn mower accident s — including 15 who are killed, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics.  In fact, riding lawn mowers are the   number one cause of amputations  among children in the U.S. each year – and have been for a decade, says the academy..

A big part of the problem is that many models still allow operators to mow in reverse.  Many of the serious accidents occurred when a mower operator, who wasn’t looking behind him and couldn’t hear above the roar of the machine, backed over a small child.   In certain John Deere models, and maybe other models, the button that allows mowing in reverse is located on the front of the machine. This encourages drivers to hold down the button and back up without looking behind them.

The AAP has urged for decades that riding lawnmowers be equipped with “no mowing in reverse” safety devices that cannot be overridden by the operator. Or, that over-ride buttons be placed on the back of the mower so that the operator has to turn all the way around and look behind him while disengaging this child safety feature.

“Pediatric lawnmower injuries, particularly due to riding mowers, are a highly preventable cause of morbidity and mortality. Increased public safety awareness and further manufacturer safety modifications should be strongly encouraged in order to limit this cause of pediatric trauma,” the academy advises.

Although the CPSC studied riding lawn mower hazards in the 1980s and 90s, problems still remain, the academy noted.   “Voluntary safety standards by the industry have addressed some of the safety hazards of lawnmowers, but further standards could help lower the injury rate. Currently, some riding lawnmowers have a ‘no mowing in reverse’ (NMIR) option that disables the mower blades while the machine is backing up. However, this option is not required and is available only on certain models. Furthermore, the option can be disabled, negating the safety benefits of the device. If this option were a mandatory feature that was not able to be disabled the operator, the majority of severe injuries in children would be prevented.”

The Toro recall involves mowers with the optional deluxe set that has a switch built-in that may activate the mower when the operator gets off, the company explained, noting the sudden activation of a blade could hurt whoever might be standing nearby.

It said the mowers were sold at Toro dealers in the U.S. and Canada from September 2005 through January of this year. It said owners can have a modification installed at no charge by a Toro dealer. Consumers can contact Toro at (866) 946-3109.

You’d think an industry that could come up with a seat-activated turn-on switch could design a product that doesn’t kill or main a couple of thousand children every year.  Listen up mower industry.

 

Virginia Graeme Baker was seven-years-old when she drowned after family members, fighting desperately, were unable to free her from the powerful suction of a hot tub drain.  Today her name lives on in the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool & Spa Safety Act, which requires anti-entrapment drain covers and other safety devices in all pools and hot tubs in the United States.

The act no doubt has saved lives. There were no reported entrapment fatalities for 2009, the latest figure available, but there were eight reports of entrapment incidents in which seven people were injured during 2009.

The safety of drain pool covers is back in the news. In March, the Consumer Product Safety Commission launched an investigation into pool drain cover safety and the laboratories that certify them.  Federal investigators say that laboratories used to test whether pool and spa drains are safe may not be using correct testing protocols, resulting in drains that could create enough suction to entrap limbs or potentially cause children to drown.

The pool and safety act was passed by Congress in December 2007 and went into effect in December 2008. Since then all public pools and spas have been required to install new anti-entrapment drain covers and other secondary devices or systems in order to be compliant with the law. Homeowners with pools may have been notified by their pool service operator and made these changes. Any newly constructed pools or spas since early 2009 should have these new covers.

The result of the agency’s investigation is expected to be announced by Memorial Day, which traditionally kicks off the summer swimming season in the U.S.  One possible remedy would be a recall of all suspect drain covers.

Meanwhile, what should pool owners do? Here’s what the Commission recommends for pool owners:

  • Contact your pool service provider to determine what type of drain cover and system you have and when it was installed.
  • If it is a non-compliant drain cover (installed before 2009), be aware that it will need to be replaced by a certified cover. Talk to your service provider about your options.
  • Keep children away from pool and spa drains.
  • Be aware that the risk to swimmers from a non-compliant drain cover is greatest in shallow kiddie pools, wading pools or pools or spas with single main drain systems.

As you take these safety precautions, remember Virginia Baker and have a safe summer.

 

Amid all the Republican political talk about the need to make it even harder for people to sue over medical malpractice, there has come a major study that concludes hospital mistakes are occurring 10 times more often than originally believed – and that was already a lot.

As published in this month’s issue of Health Affairs, the study says one out of three people admitted to a hospital is the victim of a preventable medical error. These could range from a bed sore that could lead to an infection, to an object left in the body after surgery.

The entire issue of this well-respected magazine is dedicated to patient safety. After reading it, all I can think of is the country’s urgent need for medical reform.

The researchers looked at 795 patient admissions at a hospital known for its attention to patient safety. Using a new way of measuring hospital adverse events, called the Global Trigger Tool, the group found 354 “adverse events” in the records. The findings were 10 times higher for the Global Trigger Tool, which was developed by the Institute, than for the methods usually used by hospitals to measure adverse events, the research pointed out. The obvious conclusion is that hospitals have been substantially underestimating the frequency of mistakes.

Already, the latest estimate of deaths in hospitals each year from preventable medical errors is as high as 187,000. The injury estimate is around 6.1 million. The Institute of Medicine first reported on the sad state of patient safety in the U.S. in a 1999 ground breaking report. The medical community made loud promises of taking action to lower patient risk in hospitals.

“Without doubt, we’ve seen improvements in health care over the past decade, and even pockets of excellence, but overall progress has been agonizingly slow,” said Health Affairs Editor-in-Chief Susan Dentzer in the magazine’s issue.  “It’s clear that we still have a great deal of work to do in order to achieve a health care system that is consistently high-quality—that is, safe, effective, patient-centered, efficient, timely, and devoid of disparities based on race or ethnicity.”

A separate study published in the magazine’s April issue looked at the cost of these errors. An analysis of insurance claims by Colorado researchers estimated the cost of preventable medical errors that harm patients to be $17.1 billion in 2008 dollars.  According to the study, 10 types of errors accounted for more than two-thirds of the total cost, with the most common ones being pressure ulcers, postoperative infections, and persistent back pain following back surgery.  The researchers recommended that these three types of errors be put at the head of the list for improvement.

A third study published in the magazine looked at cost a different way.  A study by the National Center for Policy Analysis found that the social cost to adverse events – or what people would be willing to pay to avoid the risk of death or injury caused by medical error – is from $393 billion to $958 billion. (Or from 18 percent to 45 percent of total US health care spending in 2006.)

Yet, the researchers noted, the United States has few policies to compensate patients harmed by medical errors other than a “very imperfect tort system.” They noted fewer than 2 percent of patients harmed ever file a malpractice suit and even fewer receive any compensation. The study recommended a possible solution: that patients be offered voluntary, no-fault insurance prior to treatment or surgery and be compensated if they suffer an adverse event—regardless of the cause. In this way, providers would have economic incentives to reduce the number of such events, the researchers noted.

Unfortunately, the political rhetoric around tort reform does not tend to be influenced by facts. And the facts are, medical mistakes are epidemic and malpractice lawsuits are rare.  How many voters have to die from medical mistakes for politicians to take notice?